Mark Duggan shooting

sorry I am just so frustrated over this article presented by The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/sep/27/mark-duggan-shooting-taxi-driver-evidence

now I fully understand that with the poccession of any sort of fire-arms is bad in itself.

but think...Mark was only transporting a gun for someone else,

forget the idea that guns are illegal for a second, because in hindsight we don't have any evidence that he was going to use it,

surely you have to think contextually, why was he doing this, it sounds to me more like a deal than him actually using it,

to have it in a shoe box gives the impression that it was like a parcel, totally planned disguise!

It's so unfair, the police are authority here, they should have atleast used the gun to stop him running, not to stop his life. They should have the practice to understand the consequences of open fire, why on earth would you do such a thing, has running after the baddy become too old fashioned now? Police had so much choice, after reading the article too it seemed as though they were hunting him down, so was it planned?

Mistake or no mistake, the police are still in the wrong, i;m sure if the gun was to do any harm...HELLO it didn't, Mark was innocent, he was an innocent man transporting a weapon contained in a box.

Hmmm so interesting how there is no mention of the police officers name, the guy who actually shot him, also there is no mention of their apology or even a slight idea of a "mistake".

All about ruling class ideology isn't it, the working class is seen as the criminal in the media in contrast to the corporate criminal who was in fact the officer who shot the guy, making him responsible for the end of someones life.

I see no Justice here at all, Mark had a gun...and a life.

The Police wanted the gun so they took away his life.

How very sad.